| Country | United States |
| State or Province | California |
| City | San Diego |
| Date | 02/01/2026, ongoing |
| Time | 22:30–02:30 (preferred observation window) |
| Weather | Varying/Not Specified |
| Duration | Recurrent over multiple years; individual duration not specified |
| Witnesses (Number) | Multiple |
| Distance | pure guess/Not Specified |
| Solid Object | No |
| Size | N/A |
| Shape | Light |
| Shape Details | Recurrent aerial light activity; daytime optical flash observed near the residence |
| Metallic/Shiny | N/A |
| Color | Not Specified |
| Glow/Halo | Not Specified |
| Lights | Yes |
| How Many Lights | Not Specified |
| How Bright | Sufficiently bright to be readily visible at night; daytime flash capable of activating motion-detection cameras |
| Light Coloration | Not Specified |
| Sound | None Reported |
| Motion/Speed | Recurrent aerial light activity observed over a fixed residential location; daytime flash reportedly occurs when movement takes place on or near the property |
| Number of Objects | Not Specified |
| Coordination/Communication | Not Specified |
| Windows | N/A |
| Occupants | N/A |
| Description | A community advocacy organization submitted a request for independent scientific observation of a recurring aerial and optical phenomenon reported over a fixed residential location in San Diego, California. According to the report, aerial light activity has been repeatedly observed during nighttime hours over multiple years and is visible to the unaided eye. In addition, a brief but distinct optical flash has reportedly occurred during daylight hours in proximity to the residence whenever movement takes place on or near the property. Although the daytime flash is not always visible to the naked eye, it has allegedly been captured on surveillance cameras and appears capable of triggering motion-detection systems, suggesting a measurable optical or possible electromagnetic component. The reporting organization states that it conducted preliminary observations consistent with witness accounts but does not attribute the phenomenon to any specific cause or origin. Instead, it requests independent observation using optical cameras, spectrometers, motion sensors, electromagnetic detectors, and other scientific instrumentation to objectively document, characterize, or rule out the reported activity. Existing documentation is reportedly available for review, and the organization indicates it can coordinate site access for investigators. Personal identifying information associated with the reporting party has been removed. UAPSRS ASSESSMENT: This is an intriguing report, and although it does not specifically describe a physical object sighting of unidentified aerial/anomalous phenomena, information included in the original case report provided to UAPSRS via email warrants additional inquiry. Case status remains open, pending follow-up. |
| Nearby Landmarks | Old Town area, San Diego, California |
| Latitude | 32.7549 |
| Longitude | -117.1973 |
| Altitude | Not Specified |
| Propulsion | N/A |
| Advanced Capabilities | Possible optical and/or electromagnetic effects suggested by surveillance camera activation; otherwise not specified |
| Visible Payload | Not Provided |
| Radar | N/A |
| Signatures | Optical flash reportedly recorded on surveillance cameras and sufficient to trigger motion-detection systems |
| Awareness | Not Specified |
| Aggression | None Reported |
| Health Effects | None Reported |
| Physical/Environmental Effects | Motion-detection systems reportedly activated by the daytime optical flash |
| Animal Disturbance | Not Specified |
| Witness Feelings | Concerned enough to seek independent scientific investigation after unsuccessful conventional reporting attempts |
| Witness Assessment | Reporting organization makes no claim regarding the phenomenon’s nature or origin and requests objective third-party scientific observation and documentation |
| Additional Info | Report submitted by [REDACTED] on behalf of a community member. The organization emphasizes that it is not drawing conclusions regarding cause, origin, or intent, but believes the recurring nature, fixed location, and defined observation window make the phenomenon suitable for independent scientific verification or dismissal. All personal identifying information has been redacted. |
No responses yet